next up previous contents
Next: Recent Experimental Results Up: Overview of Diffractive Physics Previous: Overview of Diffractive Physics

Hard Diffraction

  Ingelman and Schlein [3] proposed that the observation of jets in diffractive events would probe the partonic nature of the exchanged object, whether it is the pomeron or something else. Their paper introduced the field of hard diffractive scattering, which refers to the subset of traditional diffractive interactions characterized by high transverse momentum (tex2html_wrap_inline2834) scattering. They assumed that the pomeron can be treated as an object that exists within a proton, and that it is thus sensible to define a flux of pomerons in the proton as well as a pomeron structure function. They proposed a gluonic pomeron with either a hard structure, as would be derived from two gluons sharing the pomeron momentum tex2html_wrap_inline2836, or a soft structure like the gluonic structure of the proton tex2html_wrap_inline2838, where tex2html_wrap_inline2840 is the momentum fraction of the parton with respect to the pomeron. With these assumptions they were able to make predictions for diffractive jet production cross sections and properties.

The first experimental results on this subject were published by the UA8 Collaboration at CERN, and showed the existence of jets in single diffractive events [4] and that these jets had rapidity and longitudinal momentum distributions consistent with a hard pomeron structure [5]. There was also evidence for a ``super-hard'' or ``coherent'' pomeron, where the entire momentum of the pomeron participates in the hard scattering [5].

The UA8 Collaboration tagged diffractive events using a small angle spectrometer to detect and reconstruct the leading proton [6]. A proton spectrometer typically consists of machine magnets surrounded by a series of Roman pots, which are vessels that house position detectors. These pots can be positioned close to the beam and used to measure protons that are scattered through small angles, by measuring the bend of the track in the known magnetic field. Diffractive events can also be identified using rapidity gaps [7, 8], which are experimentally defined as the absence of particles or energy above threshold in some region of rapidity. Since the pomeron is a color singlet, radiation is suppressed in events with pomeron exchange typically resulting in large rapidity gaps in these events [9].

Figure 2 shows the diagram for hard single diffraction producing two jets, a scattered tex2html_wrap_inline2822, and a rapidity gap. This figure is identical to Fig. 1(b) for traditional diffraction except for the production of jets. We use the convenient language of Ingelman and Schlein to describe the process as occurring in two steps. First the pomeron is emitted from the tex2html_wrap_inline2822, with an emission probability described by the pomeron flux factor. The tex2html_wrap_inline2822 is scattered but remains intact, while the pomeron interacts with the proton in a hard scattering producing jets and a rapidity gap in the region near the tex2html_wrap_inline2822. The charge conjugate diagram where the proton remains intact and the tex2html_wrap_inline2822 is fragmented is equally likely. The detailed study of these interactions will yield insight into the nature of the pomeron and reveal the validity of this phenomenological picture.

  figure217
Figure 2: The diagram for a hard single diffractive interaction resulting in a final state with a scattered tex2html_wrap_inline2822 and two jets. The tex2html_wrap_inline2824-tex2html_wrap_inline2820 plot shows the distribution of particles in this event including a rapidity gap near the scattered tex2html_wrap_inline2822 and the circles which represent the two jets.


next up previous contents
Next: Recent Experimental Results Up: Overview of Diffractive Physics Previous: Overview of Diffractive Physics

Gilvan Alves
Tue Mar 17 12:50:26 GRNLNDST 1998